11 August 2012

Today in Xinjiang History: 11 August 1892


120 years ago today, the shadow-cloaked hills of the Ili Valley silently witnessed the murder of a woman and her daughter.

The story begins with Zulpiqar, a man from Kashgar who had come north across the mountains to Ghulja in the Ili Valley. Zulpiqar, a Turkic Muslim (“Turki,” or chanmin in Qing official parlance), owned his own horse, and he worked as a guide for some of those traders and travelers along the north-south route between the two cities.

Zulpiqar’s work brought him into regular contact with a trader whom Qing records call A-pa and his wife, Aysha Khan. It seems that A-pa was often away on one kind of business or another, and during those long months when he was out carting goods from settlement to settlement, though she lived with her little daughter Cholpan, Aysha got lonely. Sometime in February of 1891, Zulpiqar came by the house, and his relationship with Aysha went from flirtation to adultery. From then on, Zulpiqar would come over and give her gifts, and their affair continued for some time.


Now, at this point, it is critical to understand our sources and the narrative they provide. I am working from a palace memorial written almost a year after the events. This is a special document meant for the eyes of the Emperor and the deliberation of the Board of Punishments, the ministry that maintained the legal code and recommended to the Emperor his final decisions regarding difficult cases and capital punishments. By the time this memorial got to Beijing, the case had passed all the way up the regional bureaucratic hierarchy, from the Ningyuan county magistrate, to the Ili prefect, to the Ili-Tarbaghatai circuit intendant, to the judicial commissioner and governor in Dihua (Urumchi). At every step, the main goal was to establish the exact motivations and guilt of everyone involved.

The memorial doesn’t tell us a love story, or even a lust story. What it does is establish Aysha’s guilt by complicity in the affair and the special financial relationship between the adulterers, in accordance with Article 366 of the Qing Code, on determining consent between fornicators. If someone had reported them, and case had stopped at this point, then Zulpiqar and Aysha would each have received the same punishment: Both would have been beaten 90 times with the “heavy stick,” a massive length of wood that often caused severe internal injuries. A-pa would have to sell Aysha or marry her off to someone else. Before 1884 and the formal establishment of provincehood, their crime might not have even gone to the magistrate, but rather would have been handled through the local aqsaqal or beg and a Muslim judge. After 1884, however, Turkic Muslims found themselves subject to the same laws as Chinese.

But it didn’t stop there. A-pa was away for quite some time, and Aysha eventually spurned Zulpiqar and took up with another man, a local named Tolai. Tolai’s name suggests that he was a Mongol. Indeed, he belonged to one of the military units stationed around Ghulja under the Ili General, which included Mongol forces, though which unit was his is unclear. Tolai and Aysha must have got on well: In July 1892, when Aysha heard that her husband A-pa would soon return, she hatched a plan to abscond with Tolai to Samarqand. Tolai agreed, and they began to make arrangements.

This is the point where the judgment of the actors involved becomes seriously questionable, and not just because running off together entailed another level of punishment. A month later, Aysha approached Zulpiqar, her former lover. Aysha told him that she and Tolai were going to run away to Samarqand, quite a long journey to the west, to make a new life for themselves. She asked to rent his horse and services as a guide for the journey down the valley, westward to the Russian border. He refused, of course, and gave the excuse that he was unfamiliar with the route. Aysha pressed him. She probably felt that only Zulpiqar could be trusted to keep her flight a secret. Aysha suggested that Zulpiqar hire someone else to act as a guide, while Zulpiqar and his horse could provide protection and transportation.

Now the seed of jealousy planted long before in Zulpiqar’s heart grew into a thorny and tangled vine. Zulpiqar was extremely upset, or at least that’s what he told the magistrate: Aysha had rejected him, and now she wanted him to help her escape with her new beau. Zulpiqar envisioned himself on the nighttime journey, escaping down some isolated mountain pass, just him, Aysha, and Tolai… He pretended to agree to this latest plan and went off to “hire a guide.”

The man that Zulpiqar found was Nawruz, a close friend and associate who sympathized with his plight. After a long talk, Nawruz consented to join Zulpiqar in his grim task. Now Zulpiqar put on his friendly face and reported to Aysha that they would depart at dusk on the evening of 11 August 1892. They may have wanted to take advantage of the visibility afforded by the full moon.

That night, a little after seven o’clock in the evening, Zulpiqar and Nawruz armed themselves with daggers and wooden poles. They led their horses to nearby Nanyuan, where Aysha lived. Tolai was there, carrying clothing and traveling gear in a pack on his back, and Aysha had her daughter Cholpan, only four sui (three years) old, swaddled and ready for a hard ride.

They all mounted their horses. Tolai and Aysha rode in front, sharing a saddle, while Nawruz took the middle horse, and Zulpiqar held up the rear with Cholpan seated safely in his lap.

The party made for Yellow-grass Lake, which lay about seven miles to the west. This cannot have been an arbitrary choice. According to the local gazetteer, written fifteen years after these events, the road to Yellow-grass Lake was narrow and rarely-traveled – perhaps Aysha and Tolai wanted to avoid running into anyone on their way out of town. But it was also plied by bands of Kazakh bandits, and Zulpiqar and Nawruz may have wanted to cover up their crime. Three dead travelers on the road to Yellow-grass Lake would have surprised no one, and certainly the bandits would be blamed.

By the time they reached Yellow-grass Lake, it was the middle of the night.  Zulpiqar flung the little Cholpan away into the grass, and he gave Nawruz the signal that it was time to strike. Nawruz used his long wooden pole to knock Tolai to the ground, and, as Tolai fell, he dragged Aysha with him. Zolpiqar dismounted and rushed over. He chopped at her with his dagger, ignoring Tolai and the child. Eventually, he noticed that Cholpan was sitting in the grass, wailing in despair. He told Nawruz to finish Aysha off with his dagger while he slit the child’s throat.

Tolai, his dream inverted, managed to escape the bloody scene into the lake. Zulpiqar and Nawruz searched for him, but he was nowhere to be found, so they tossed the gear he was carrying in the water, hoping to hide it and perhaps suggest that Kazakh bandits had robbed the party of their goods. They turned around and led the horses back to town, leaving the corpses of Aysha and her little daughter to lie in the dirt at the side of the road.

The next day, a man named Qurban was traveling to Yellow-grass Lake when he ran across their broken bodies. He sped back to Ghulja to report the crime to the Chinese country magistrate, Gao Jingchang. At the time, only about 28,000 civilian adults lived in the whole area of Ghulja, half of whom were locally-born Turkic Muslims. Tolai belonged to a military garrison. In such small communities, it was probably quite easy to connect the deceased with her lovers and her murderers and track them all down.

The magistrate handled their interrogations locally, and his judgments were fairly straightforward. Article 287.8 stated that someone who murdered two members of a family was to be beheaded, after which his head would be exposed publicly, and that half of his wealth should go to the family of his victims. Zulpiqar had not just killed a couple of adults in a crime of passion, however – he had committed the premeditated murder of a child, which the Qing Code and the magistrate rightly considered to be inordinately cruel. Yet, there was no way to increase the punishment to a higher degree. The warden tattooed Zulpiqar’s face to show that he was a murderer, and the execution was carried out in short order.

Per the provisions in Article 30, the accomplice to such a crime was to receive a lower grade of punishment. Nawruz was sentenced to be strangled. In the eyes of Qing law, this punishment was milder, as it did not dismember or mutilate the body – to do so was itself a high crime, unless ordered by the imperial state. For his role in the killing, Nawruz was held in the county jail until the autumn excises, at which time his case would be reviewed. He might have received a reduced punishment; he might have been bound by a cord to a pole and strangled to death in the market.

Tolai, entirely apart from his adultery, had knowledge of and abetted a wife fleeing her husband. Tolai, however, was a soldier and so was punished according to the military statutes: He was exiled the considerable distance of 4,000 li to continue his military service elsewhere. Technically, 4,000 li was over a thousand miles, but the actual system of military exile was hardly transparent. One wonders where he ended up. Xinjiang, and the Ili Valley in particular, were the sites of exile for many criminals from China proper. But where did one go when exiled from Xinjiang? Some were sent to the most miasmic and disease-ridden regions of the Southeast. Perhaps Tolai died of malaria in Guangxi.

What do we learn from tragedies? Often, violent conflict arises along social fault lines. It tells us about the tensions in a community. My research so far suggests that the greatest percentage of murders in Xinjiang in this period arose directly or indirectly from marital strife. This might seem to tell us more about individual couples’ problems than about society at large, but the patterns are consistent: Partners’ distance bred uncertainty and enmity, so traders and those who were forced by poverty to labor away from home, particularly as miners, frequently found themselves involved in murder cases as victims, aggressors, or instigators.

We also learn that ethnic boundaries were not as rigid as we might think, despite the Qing institutionalization of ethnicity. This was a time when Qing officials were figuring out where the Turki fit into the administrative schema available to them. The Ili Valley was a place where multiple ethnic groups from different countries and different regions across Asia lived in overlapping communities: Taranchis, Turki from the South, Chinese from the Interior, Chinese from Ili, Manchus, Mongols, Kazakhs, Tatars, Russians, even Chinese Catholics exiled generations before. Some answered to Chinese officials and others to a Manchu military general. How did they learn to coexist?

Perhaps most importantly, however, we can begin to empathize with our historical subjects. The history of Xinjiang is dominated by high politics, punctuated by violent episodes. Shouldn’t it proceed in equal measure from the lives of farmers, laborers, traders, and garrison soldiers? Despite the distance down the valley’s narrow path, can’t we still discern something of their halos in the moonlight, what Zulpiqar was, what Cholpan might have been?

No comments:

Post a Comment